Legal Opinion

Skinner v. Zoning Bd. of Adjust., Cherry Hill Tp.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided September 26, 1963PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

80 N.J. Super. 380 (1963)

193 A.2d 861

RICHARD E. SKINNER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE TOWNSHIP OF CHERRY HILL, AND BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE TOWNSHIP OF CHERRY HILL, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued September 9, 1963.

Decided September 26, 1963.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, KILKENNY and COLLESTER.

Mr. Warren C. Douglas argued the cause for appellants.

Mr. William C. Davis argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Starr, Summerill & Davis, attorneys; Mr. Davis of counsel).

The opinion of the court was delivered by KILKENNY,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. National Broadcasting Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Huron Portland Cement Co. v. City of DetroitSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Lord AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. Wright v. VogtSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Charlie Brown of Chatham, Inc. v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT FOR TOWNSHIP OF CHATHAMNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
  2. Livingston Tp. v. MarchevNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
  3. Smith v. Board of County CommissionersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Garden State Farms, Inc. v. Mayor Louis Bay, IISupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
  5. LIMA PARTNERS v. Borough of NorthvaleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API