Legal Opinion
Aetna Life Insurance v. Schilling
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided August 25, 1993No. 92-1375PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
R.C. 1339.63 provides, in part:
*166“(A) As used in this section:
“(1) ‘Beneficiary’ means a beneficiary of a life insurance policy, an annuity, a payable on death account, an individual retirement plan, an employer death benefit plan, or another right to death benefits arising under a contract.
it * * *
“(B)(1) Unless the designation of beneficiary or the judgment or decree granting the divorce, dissolution of marriage, or annulment specifically .provides otherwise, and subject to division (B)(2) of this section, if a spouse designates the. other spouse as a beneficiary * * * and if * * * the spouse…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Talley v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen, & Helpers, Local No. 377Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
- Smith v. ParsonsOhio Supreme Court · 1823
3Cited by19 opinions
- Ross v. Farmers Insurance Group of CompaniesOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Hill v. DeWittSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- Bielat v. BielatOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Ross v. Farmers Ins. Group of Cos.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
- Parsonese v. Midland National InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.