Legal Opinion

Aetna Life Insurance v. Schilling

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 25, 1993No. 92-1375PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

R.C. 1339.63 provides, in part:

*166“(A) As used in this section:
“(1) ‘Beneficiary’ means a beneficiary of a life insurance policy, an annuity, a payable on death account, an individual retirement plan, an employer death benefit plan, or another right to death benefits arising under a contract.

it * * *

“(B)(1) Unless the designation of beneficiary or the judgment or decree granting the divorce, dissolution of marriage, or annulment specifically .provides otherwise, and subject to division (B)(2) of this section, if a spouse designates the. other spouse as a beneficiary * * * and if * * * the spouse…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Talley v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen, & Helpers, Local No. 377Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Smith v. ParsonsOhio Supreme Court · 1823

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Ross v. Farmers Insurance Group of CompaniesOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Hill v. DeWittSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  3. Bielat v. BielatOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Ross v. Farmers Ins. Group of Cos.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Parsonese v. Midland National InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API