Legal Opinion

State v. Musta

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 22, 1969No. 40894PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sheran, Justice.

Appeal from a judgment of conviction entered February 17, 1967, after defendant had been found guilty by a jury of aggravated robbery and aggravated assault as charged in an indictment. He was sentenced for aggravated robbery, but not for the assault.

Upon this appeal, it is contended that defendant was denied due process of law in the proceedings which resulted in his conviction because:(1) The arrest of defendant on May 24, 1966, was made pursuant to a warrant for arrest which was not authorized by a magistrate after an adequate showing of probable cause as required by State…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  2. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  3. State v. BurchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  4. Whiteman v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1928
  5. State v. ReilandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Santiago v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  2. State of Minnesota v. Mo Savoy HicksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  3. Santiago v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  4. State of Minnesota v. Mo Savoy HicksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API