Legal Opinion

Lee County Gin Co. v. Middlebrooks

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1931No. 29491PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcGowen, J.

The appellee, Middlebrooks, sued the appellant, the Lee County Gin Company, for damages for personal injuries, the cause was submitted to a jury, a substantial verdict was rendered, and there was a judgment against the gin company, from which judgment appeal is prosecuted here.

The appellee, Middlebrooks, had carried his cotton to the gin, where his loaded wagon was waiting in line while the cotton from other wagons ahead of him was being-unloaded, ginned, and the cotton in bales reloaded in the wagons and moved on. While appellee was standing in the gin yard near the road which was used as an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. WoodhamMississippi Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Herrin, Lambert & Co. v. DalyMississippi Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Dean v. BrannonMississippi Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Mississippi Ice & Utilities Co. v. PearceMississippi Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Yazoo City v. LogginsMississippi Supreme Court · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Continental Southern Lines, Inc. v. KlaasMississippi Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Holmes v. T. M. Strider & Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Stricklin v. HarveyMississippi Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Tighe v. CrosthwaitMississippi Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Goodwin v. MisticosMississippi Supreme Court · 1949

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API