Legal Opinion
Holmes v. T. M. Strider & Co.
Mississippi Supreme Court
Decided June 5, 1939No. 33736PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcGehee, J.
The question presented for decision on this appeal is whether the court below was in error in granting a peremptory instruction in favor of the appellees. It is necessary to such decision, that we consider everything to have been proven which the evidence establishes, directly or by reasonable inference, against the parties in whose favor the instruction was granted. New Orleans & N. E. R. Co. v. Jackson, 140 Miss. 375,105 So. 770; New Orleans & N. E. R. Co. v. Martin, 140 Miss. 410, 105 So. 864; Yates v. Houston & Murray, 141 Miss. 881, 106 So. 110; Lowe v. Mobile & O. R. Co., 149 Miss.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. WoodhamMississippi Supreme Court · 1910
- Keith v. Yazoo M.V.R. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1934
- Public Service Corp. v. WattsMississippi Supreme Court · 1933
- Solomon v. Continental Baking Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1935
- Stricklin v. HarveyMississippi Supreme Court · 1938
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Helen Hanna, Cicero Hanna v. Annie C. Fletcher, Trustee of Estate of Florence Johnson, Benjamin F. Fletcher, and Fred S. Gichner Iron Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
- Baker v. FryarNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- King v. MasonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957
- Finley P. Smith, Inc. v. SchectmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
- Meridian Hatcheries, Inc. v. TroutmanMississippi Supreme Court · 1957
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.