Legal Opinion
Jeter v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 5, 1983No. A016529PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
POCHÉ, J.
By petition for writ of prohibition (Pen. Code, § 999a), Maurice Jeter challenges the admission of certain evidence at his preliminary hearing alleging that the evidence was the product of an improper entry into his home to execute a search warrant.
Testimony at the preliminary hearing revealed that Officer Munoz, accompanied by four other police officers, arrived at 1224 Fruitvale Avenue about 11 a.m. on July 30, 1981, to serve a search warrant. No surveillance of the premises was undertaken. The officers drove up and parked. Then Officer Munoz knocked on the front door and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Badillo v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Rogers v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Duke v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. ElderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. MacAvoyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- People v. NeerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- People v. TrujilloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- People v. BrittonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.