Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Elder

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 27, 1976No. Crim. 7591PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT.

Defendant Elder was found guilty by a jury of 1 count of conspiracy to commit bookmaking (Pen. Code, § 182, subd. 1) and 29 counts of violation of Penal Code section 337a (hookmaking). Defendant Hatrick was found guilty of 1 count of conspiracy to commit bookmaking (Pen. Code, § 182, subd. 1) and 27 counts of violation of Penal Code section 337a (bookmaking).

Both defendants were granted probation.

Facts

Ronald Mitre, an undercover operative in a bookmaking investigation by the Orange County District Attorney’s Organized Crime Unit, on JunelL 197^ contacted George Brazer at the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Burrows v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. People v. PetersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. People v. HornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. People v. WongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. ChapmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. People v. NeerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. People v. TrujilloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  4. People v. McCarterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. People v. GalloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API