Legal Opinion
Schrum v. Moskaluk
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided September 20, 1995No. 45A04-9504-CV-134PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RILEY, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Plaintiffs-Appellants, Katherine, Eva and Peter Schrum (hereinafter collectively referred to as "the Schrums" and individually as (Katherine", "Eva", and "Peter") appeal from the grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee Sonya Moskaluk (Sonya) following the Schrums' premises Ha-bility action.
We reverse and remand.
ISSUES
The dispositive issue raised in this appeal is:
Whether a homeowner operating a rummage sale on her property owes a duty of reasonable care to the children of those attending or participating in the sale, or whether her…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Burrell v. MeadsIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- Rosi v. Business Furniture Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1993
- Indiana Department of State Revenue v. Caylor-Nickel Clinic, P.C.Indiana Supreme Court · 1992
- Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. BarnhartIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Hammond v. AllegrettiIndiana Supreme Court · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- General Motors Corp. v. Northrop Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- Branham v. Celadon Trucking Services, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Bunch v. TiwariIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Zawistoski v. Gene B. Glick Co., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Jacques v. Allied Building Services of Indiana, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.