Phillip Bundy v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TERRIE LIVINGSTON, Justice.
Introduction
Appellant Phillip Bundy appeals his conviction for murder. In four issues, he asserts that the trial court erred by excluding character evidence of the deceased’s violent nature, refusing to include a requested jury instruction regarding apparent danger, and failing to require a unanimous verdict through the language of the jury charge, and that the evidence is factually insufficient to support the jury’s rejection of his self-defense claim. We affirm.
*428Background Facts
At around three o’clock in the afternoon of February 27, 2005, at an apartment…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Cain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Sims v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Ngo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Roberto Sanchez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2013
- Kenneth Ramone Dearborn, II v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014
- Sipes v. City of GrapevineCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2004
- Leticia Bleil v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Petrit Diko v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.