Legal Opinion

Sipes v. City of Grapevine

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided August 31, 2004No. 2-02-323-CVPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANNE GARDNER, Justice.

I. Introduction

Amy Sipes and Tana Trevino n/k/a/ Tana Waddell appeal the trial court’s summary judgment in favor of the City of Grapevine. In three issues on appeal, appellants assert that the City did not establish as a matter of law that it is immune from suit, that its actions were not a proximate cause of appellants’ injuries, or that it did not receive actual notice of Trevino’s claim. We affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.

II. Factual and Procedural Background

Appellants were injured in an automobile accident on November 28, 1997, as they traveled…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Ford Motor Co. v. RidgwayTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Southwestern Electric Power Co. v. GrantTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Rhone-Poulenc, Inc. v. SteelTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  5. County of Cameron v. BrownTexas Supreme Court · 2002

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. City of Grapevine v. SipesTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Texas Department of Transportation v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2005
  3. Texas Department of Transportation v. Pate, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2005
  4. Texas Department of Criminal Justice v. Simons, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2006
  5. Alma Rojas and Elda Vera v. the County of El Paso, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2013

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API