Sims v. State

in which KELLER, P.J., MEYERS, JOHNSON, HOLCOMB, and COCHRAN, JJ., joined.

Today we are called upon to decide whether and to what extent a reviewing court must discuss particular evidence admitted at trial when an appellant claims that the evidence was factually insufficient to support his conviction. We conclude that, as a general proposition, reviewing courts should at least mention what the parties assert is the most important or most relevant evidence supporting a claim that the evidence is factually insufficient.

The appellant was convicted of driving while intoxicated. The issue of the…