Gillum v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.
The correctness of the judgment below depends upon whether appellee’s decedent, Andrew Gillum, was in the service of J. O. Wamsley or was an independent contractor.
The usual test applied to determine whether such an arrangement as we iiave here under consideration creates the relationship of servant-or of independent contractor is that if the employer reserves the right to control the manner or means of doing the work, the relationship is that of master and servant," while if the manner or means is left to the operative who is responsible to the employer for the result only, an independent…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Coviello v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1935
- Miller v. Metropolitan Life Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1938
- State Ex Rel. Bettman v. ChristenOhio Supreme Court · 1934
- Industrial Commission v. McAdowOhio Supreme Court · 1933
- Klar v. Erie Rd. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- United States v. OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bostic v. ConnorOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Marshall v. AaronOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Berge v. Columbus Community Cable AccessOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
- Duke v. Sanymetal Products Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1972
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.