Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Rhoten v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1996No. 1994-2137PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 77 Ohio St.3d 8.] THE STATE EX REL. RHOTEN, APPELLEE, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLANT. [Cite as State ex rel. Rhoten v. Indus. Comm.,

1996-Ohio-110.] Workers’ compensation—Application for permanent total disability compensation—Industrial Commission abuses its discretion in denying claim when its order does not satisfy Noll requirements. (No. 94-2137—Submitted July 24, 1996—Decided October 23, 1996.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 93APD08-1158. __________________ {¶ 1} Appellee-claimant, Evelyn…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Noll v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State ex rel. Gay v. MihmOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State ex rel. Haddix v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State ex rel. Rhoten v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1996

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Chapman v. Indus. Comm., 07ap-1070 (9-18-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API