Legal Opinion

Chapman v. Indus. Comm., 07ap-1070 (9-18-2008)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 18, 2008No. 07AP-1070PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

{¶ 1} Relator, Arthur Chapman, seeks a writ of mandamus ordering respondent, Industrial Commission of Ohio ("commission"), to vacate an order denying relator's application for permanent total disability ("PTD") compensation.1 Relator also seeks other relief as this court deems appropriate.

{¶ 2} Pursuant to former Loc. R. 12(M) of the Tenth District Court of Appeals, 2 this court appointed a magistrate without limitation of authority specified in Civ. R. 53(C) to consider relator's cause of action. After examining the evidence, the magistrate issued a decision, wherein she made…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State ex rel. Noll v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State ex rel. Teece v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State ex rel. Gay v. MihmOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State ex rel. Burley v. Coil Packing, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Lee v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API