Legal Opinion
Carballo Ex Rel. Cortes v. Apfel
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 4, 1999No. 98 Civ. 0163(RWS)PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
In this action brought by plaintiff Alisubel Carballo on behalf of her minor child, Heria-berto Cortes (“Heriaberto”), pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to obtain judicial review of a final decision by defendant Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (the “Commissioner”), denying the application of Carballo’s child for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) benefits based on disability, both Carballo and the Commissioner have moved for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Carballo has…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Janine A. WAGNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Edwind F. PRATTS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Ermano Valente v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Calzada v. ASTUREDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Hickman Ex Rel. M.A.H. v. AstrueDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2010
- Correale-Englehart v. AstrueDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Kane v. AstrueDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- McClain v. BarnhartDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.