Legal Opinion
Mansour v. Clark
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 7, 1968No. File No. CV 1-675-25354PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKosicki, J.
The complaint alleges that on December 16, 1966, the plaintiff and the defendant entered into an agreement for the purchase and sale of land; that thereafter the defendant acquired and now owns in fee the land described in the contract; and that on March 16, 1967, the plaintiff tendered payment and demanded conveyance, which was refused. It is also alleged that the plaintiff is still ready, able and willing to pay the amount agreed upon. He requests a decree compelling conveyance and a judgment for damages. The contract relied on is annexed to the complaint and consists of a letter.1
*441The…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Santoro v. MackSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Rutt v. RocheSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Gendelman v. MongilloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
- Montanaro v. PandolfiniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- McMahon v. PlumbSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lindquist v. City of Jersey City Fire DepartmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
- T & M Building Co. v. HastingsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
- Amity Apartments, Inc. v. MartinConnecticut Appellate Court · 1970