Legal Opinion
Dunn v. . the People
New York Court of Appeals
Decided January 5, 1864PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] There was no well-founded objection to the testimony of Hodge, against the reception of which the defendant excepted. It was a material fact, if it was a fact, that the defendant was the father of the child of which the prosecutrix was enciente. It would afford a motive on his part for the commission of the offence imputed to him in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. CostelloCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
- Haskins v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
- Dunlop v. PattersonNew York Supreme Court · 1825
3Cited by47 opinions
- Basoff v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Pease v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- People v. ClappCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Solander v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1873
- Place v. . MinsterNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.