Legal Opinion

Whalen v. Connelly

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 20, 1996No. 94-1897PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRIS, Justice.

The advent of riverboat gambling in Iowa prompted these parties to contract for a business venture. This rather complicated lawsuit is over the extent of the undertaking. The defendants, a Pennsylvania entrepreneur and his enterprises, contend the undertaking was limited to a portion of a Davenport, Iowa, venture. Plaintiff, an Iowa businessman, contends it extended to a portion of all defendants’ enterprises. On appeal the question is made a good deal more difficult because it was resolved in district court by way of granting a motion for summary judgment. Because such a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Citadel Holding Corp. v. RovenSupreme Court of Delaware · 1992
  4. Kurtenbach v. TeKippeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
  5. Chariton Feed and Grain, Inc. v. HarderSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Schaller Telephone Company v. Golden Sky Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
  2. Smidt v. PorterSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
  3. C & J Vantage Leasing Co., Assignor to Frontier Leasing Corp., Assignee v. Thomas Wolfe D/B/A Lake Macbride Golf Course and Thomas Wolfe, IndividuallySupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
  4. Hartig Drug Co. v. HartigSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  5. Rieff v. EvansSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API