Legal Opinion

Time Warner Entertainment Co. v. Whiteman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 2004No. 49S02-0402-CV-47PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SULLIVAN, Justice.

Two customers of a cable television company who paid the "late fees" imposed on their bills sued to get back a portion of the money they had paid, arguing that the fee imposed exceeded the cable company's cost of collection. The Court of Appeals held that they were not entitled to recover because they had made the payments voluntarily. We hold that the "voluntary payments doctrine" is not applicable here.

Background

Jean Wilson and Kelly Whiteman were both subscribers to the cable television service of Time Warner Entertainment, L.P. Each signed a contract with Time Warner…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Winkler v. V.G. Reed & Sons, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Skendzel v. MarshallIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Raymundo v. Hammond Clinic Ass'nIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Fresh Cut, Inc. v. FazliIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Jaquith v. HudsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1858

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. BMG Direct Marketing, Inc. v. PeakeTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. MAIA FALCONI-SACHS v. LPF SENATE SQUARE, LLCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Booth v. WileyIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Chi Yun Ho v. FryeIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Officer v. Chase Ins. Life and Annuity Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API