Legal Opinion
Skendzel v. Marshall
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided October 4, 1973No. 773S145PublishedCited by 179 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHunter, J.
Petitioners seek transfer to this Court as a result of an adverse ruling by the Court of Appeals. Plaintiff-respondents originally brought suit to obtain possession of certain real estate through the enforcement of a forfeiture clause in a land sale contract. Plaintiff-respondents suffered a negative judgment, from which they appealed. The Court of Appeals reversed, holding that the defendant-petitioners had breached the contract and that the plaintiff-respondents had not waived their right to enforce the forfeiture provisions of the contract.
In December of 1958, Mary Burkowski, as vendor,…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Hardin v. BoydSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Lewis v. HawkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Champion v. BrownNew York Court of Chancery · 1822
- Mark v. KahnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
- Walker v. NunnenkampIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by179 opinions
- Consultants, Incorporated v. BarnesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- In the Matter of George William Jones and Grace Eilene Jones, Debtors. Appeal of Ward W. Miller, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Indianapolis Airport Authority v. Travelers Property Casualty Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- U. S. Aircraft Financing, Inc. v. JankovichIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Willsey v. Peoples Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of East ChicagoIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
174 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.