Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Lee v. South Carolina Department of Natural Resources

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 27, 2000No. 25095PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Justice:

Respondents Lee and Burris .brought a declaratory judgment action against South Carolina Department of Natural Resources (Department) challenging the validity of statutes and regulations prohibiting the hunting of “big game” (turkey, deer, and bear) on Sunday in eighteen Upstate counties. The circuit court granted summary judgment to respondents on the issues relating to deer and turkey hunting. We reverse.

FACTS

Respondents Lee and Burris are hunters who want to hunt big game on Sunday on land each owns in Newberry and Fairfield Counties. However, hunting big game on Sunday on…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Vance v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Timmons v. South Carolina Tricentennial CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1970
  5. Foster v. South Carolina Department of Highways & Public TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. McLeod v. StarnesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
  2. Bodman v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
  3. Worsley Companies, Inc. v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  4. Ed Robinson Laundry & Dry Cleaning, Inc. v. South Carolina Department of RevenueSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  5. Boiter v. South Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API