Boiter v. South Carolina Department of Transportation
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hearn
Two issues are presented in this appeal: (1) whether the two-tier statutory cap in the South Carolina Tort Claims Act is constitutional, and (2) whether two separate governmental entities’ negligent acts, which resulted in severe injuries to *126Larry Lee and Jeannie Boiter (collectively, the Boiters) constitute one or two occurrences under the Tort Claims Act. The circuit court found the statutory caps constitutional and that only one occurrence was presented by the facts. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
FACTS
The Boiters were injured when the motorcycle they were riding collided with a car…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Lee v. Colorado Department of HealthSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- Folz v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
- TNS Mills, Inc. v. South Carolina Department of RevenueSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- Charleston County Parks & Recreation Commission v. SomersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Doe v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
- In the Matter of Jeffrey Allen ChapmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
- Boiter v. South Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
- Doe v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
- Gifford v. Horry County South CarolinaDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2023
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.