Legal Opinion

Bodman v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 8, 2013No. Appellate Case No. 2011-187466; No. 27248PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hearn

Mark Twain once quipped, “What is the difference between a taxidermist and a tax collector? The taxidermist takes only your skin.” Not necessarily so, according to Matthew Bod-man. In this action brought in our original jurisdiction, Bodman alleges that the sheer number of exemptions to and caps on this State’s sales and use tax removes any rational relationship they have to the underlying tax itself. He therefore requests that we strike down all of the exemptions and caps as being unconstitutional, leaving behind only the imposition of the tax. In particular, he contends that the entire…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Massachusetts v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Joytime Distributors & Amusement Co. v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  4. Baird v. Charleston CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  5. In Re the Treatment & Care of LuckabaughSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. OdomSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2015
  2. Town of Arcadia Lakes v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2013
  3. Amazon Services, LLC v. SCDORCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2024
  4. Ani Creation v. City of Myrtle BeachSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2023
  5. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC v. SCDORCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2024

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API