Legal Opinion

Foster v. South Carolina Department of Highways & Public Transportation

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 6, 1992No. 23548PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Toal, Justice:

In this suit the Respondent-Appellant, Foster, sued the Highway Department under the South Carolina Tort Claims Act (SCTCA). The Highway Department appeals the verdict for Foster claiming that: (1) the trial court erred in admitting a letter written to the Department by a resident, (2) the trial court erred in failing to find Foster contributorily negligent as a matter of law, and (3) as a matter of law, the Highway Department’s employees’ acts were discretionary and entitled to immunity under the Act. Foster cross-appealed, claiming the trial court erred in reducing her Three…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Califano v. JobstSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. DoCanto v. Ametek, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  3. Duke Power Co. v. South Carolina Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  4. Wright Ex Rel. Green v. Colleton County School DistrictSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  5. Niver v. S.C. Department of Highways & Public TransportationCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Doe Ex Rel. Johnson v. South Carolina Department of Social ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
  2. Creech v. South Carolina Wildlife & Marine Resources DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  3. Summer v. CarpenterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  4. Strange v. S.C. Department of Highways & Public TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  5. Faile v. South Carolina Department of Juvenile JusticeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API