Legal Opinion

Smith v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.

District Court, D. Vermont

Decided January 25, 1985No. Civ. A. 83-280PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COFFRIN, Chief Judge.

Introduction

This is a diversity action brought by an injured passenger, Jeffrey Smith, arising out of an automobile accident that occurred on November 6, 1982, in Berlin, Vermont. Mr. Smith alleges negligence on the part of Defendant driver, Lee Young, and also alleges strict liability 1 against Defendant tire manufacturer, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (Goodyear).

In their answers to Plaintiff’s interrogatories, Defendants have relied in part upon the so-called “seat belt defense,” asserting that their liability is reduced or completely erased by the fact that…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Suter v. San Angelo Foundry & MacHine CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. Spier v. BarkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Thibault v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  4. Sunday v. Stratton Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1978
  5. Turi Caiazzo and Frank Caiazzo v. Volkswagenwerk A. G., and Volkswagen of America, Inc., Bruce Beard Volkswagen, Inc. And James ValentineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Law v. Superior Court of State of Ariz.Arizona Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Reeves v. GentileUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Langlois v. Town of ProctorSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
  4. Webb v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1996
  5. Meyer v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API