Legal Opinion
People v. Entriken
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 22, 1930No. Docket No. 3PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
An indictment was returned by the grand jury of Imperial County charging appellants and Y. Takahashi, an alien Japanese, with the crime of conspiring together in the making of a lease of agricultural lands in violation of the Alien Land Law of the state of California. The case was dismissed against Takahashi to' enable him to become a witness for the People, and the jury found the appellants guilty as charged.
It appears that appellants were the owners of the land in question. Some time prior to July 1, 1928, Takahashi went into possession of the land and began to farm it. In November, 1928, a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. YeagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- People v. BeggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- People v. OsakiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- People v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- People v. Ong Mon FooCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Morrison v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- People v. GriffinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- People v. PaytonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- People v. ChapmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- People v. GreeneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.