Legal Opinion

People v. Ong Mon Foo

California Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1920No. Crim. No. 2266PublishedCited by 24 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. Michael J. Roche, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, C. J.

—The defendant was convicted of murder of the first degree for the killing of one Wong Kim Chong, and appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new tri,al.

The deceased, who was a Chinese, was at work in his place of business, a small clothes dyeing and cleaning establishment on Clay Street near Stockton Street, San Francisco, between 5 and 6 o’clock P. M. on January 28, 1919, in the company of his wife and an employee, both Chinese, when a man, also Chinese, entered from the street and asked for a suit of clothes, giving his name as Mun Kee. The deceased instructed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. AmayaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. People v. LaparaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. People v. ByrneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. People v. BabcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. People v. SimmonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. People v. BemisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. People v. EganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  4. People v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  5. People v. GreeneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API