Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Medlock v. South Carolina State Family Farm Development Authority

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 11, 1983No. 21975PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ness, Justice:

This action tests the validity of Act No. 179, § 15, the Family Farm Development Act, now codified at S. C. Code Ann. § 46-47-10 et seq. (Cum. Supp. 1982). The trial judge held that the Act constitutional, and we affirm.

The Act empowers the Authority to issue revenue bonds to provide loans to low and moderate income farmers through three methods of financing: (1) direct loans, (2) loans to lending institutions, and (3) loan purchases. Under the first method, the Authority may issue bonds and loan the proceeds to qualified farmers. The second method allows the Authority to lend…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Clarke v. South Carolina Public Service AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
  2. Hercules Inc. v. South Carolina Tax CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  3. Green v. City of Rock HillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
  4. Bauer v. South Carolina State Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  5. State v. SolomonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Gary Concrete Products, Inc. v. RileySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  2. Brown v. County of HorrySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  3. Carll v. South Carolina Jobs-Economic Development AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  4. GTE Sprint Communications Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  5. Casey v. Richland County CouncilSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API