Legal Opinion

Astoria Federal Mortgage Corp. v. Matschke

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 2, 2008No. AC 29428PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

In this foreclosure action, the defendants, Arthur Matschke and Elaine Matschke, appeal from the judgment of the trial court denying their motion to open a judgment of foreclosure by sale. We dismiss the appeal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

The plaintiff, Astoria Federal Mortgage Corporation, commenced a foreclosure action against the defendants in the summer of 2005 with respect to real property located in Bridgewater (property). On February 27, 2006, the court rendered judgment of foreclosure by sale, finding the value of the property to be $625,000. The defendants did not…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Loisel v. RoweSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. Chapman Lumber, Inc. v. TagerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  3. Narumanchi v. DeStefanoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  4. Statewide Grievance Committee v. BurtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  5. Jacqueline Properties, LLC v. GartrellConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sanle Zhang v. 56 Locust Rd., LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
  2. Astoria Federal Mortgage Coporation v. MatschkeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  3. Astoria Federal Mortgage Corp. v. MatschkeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API