Legal Opinion

In re Marriage of Lutterman

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 1, 2004No. 901529; A117724PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.

Husband appeals from a judgment for contempt of court, arguing that the court should have granted his motion for summary judgment because wife’s contempt action was barred by claim preclusion. We review for errors of law and reverse and remand.

The parties’ marriage was dissolved on January 25, 1991. The dissolution judgment incorporated their marital settlement agreement (MSA). The parties’ MSA provides, among other things, that, in the event that the family residence is occupied by a person other than husband, whether or not husband continues to occupy the family residence, such occupant…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rennie v. Freeway TransportOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Hampton Tree Farms, Inc. v. JewettOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Whitaker v. Bank of NewportOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Hoy v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  5. Stevens v. HortonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Najjar v. Safeway, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  2. Handam v. Wilsonville Holiday Partners, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. Froeber v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. Jakobitz v. Iron Horse Business Services, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  5. In re Marriage of DietschCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API