Legal Opinion

Handam v. Wilsonville Holiday Partners, LLC

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 6, 2008No. C052825CV; A131788PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing his claim against his former employer, Wilsonville Holiday Partners, LLC (Wilsonville), for payment on a default judgment against Lockhart Investments, LLC, which managed a hotel for Wilsonville. The complaint also sought to hold Lockhart Investments’s principal, Patrick Lockhart (Lockhart), personally liable for the default judgment against Lockhart Investments. The trial court concluded that plaintiffs complaint failed to state a claim against either party. We affirm.

In determining the sufficiency of a complaint, we accept a plaintiffs…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Rennie v. Freeway TransportOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Dean v. Exotic Veneers, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Amfac Foods, Inc. v. International Systems & Controls Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Stanfield v. LaccoarceOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Whitaker v. Bank of NewportOregon Supreme Court · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Handam v. Wilsonville Holiday Partners, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  2. Lucas v. Lake CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. Great American Insurance v. LindermanDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2015
  4. Pedroso v. NoothCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  5. Sterling Savings Bank v. Emerald Development Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API