Froeber v. Liberty Mutual Insurance
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
In this case, objectors to a class-action settlement appeal the trial court’s approval of a settlement agreement. ORCP 32 D. Specifically, objectors argue that the trial court erred by approving a settlement that (1) purported to release unpleaded claims that did not arise from the same factual predicate as the claims pleaded in the underlying class action and (2) provided inadequate and misleading notice as to claims that the settlement agreement released. For the following reasons, we affirm the trial court’s approval of the settlement agreement.
This case originated with a complaint in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Visa U.S.A. Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- In Re: Prudential Insurance Company of America Sales Practice Litigation Marvin Lowe and Alice LoweCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. BolgerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Williams v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Villacres v. Abm Industries Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- Belknap v. U. S. Bank National Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- Villacres v. Abm Industries Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- Belknap v. US BANK NAT. ASS'NCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- Schiff v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.