Legal Opinion

Boyd v. Big Three Ranch Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 15, 1913No. Civ. No. 1253PublishedCited by 10 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County and from an order refusing a new trial. Benjemin F. Bledsoe, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, P. J.

The action was one by a firm of real estate brokers to recover commissions on account of the sale of real estate. The facts connected with the transaction are these: On May 10, 1910, defendant corporation, through its secretary and treasurer, addressed a communication to plaintiffs by which it appointed them agents to negotiate the sale of an orange ranch comprising one hundred and eight acres, which ranch included a number of separate tracts, upon some of which were houses, and all of which were set out in oranges in various stage's of maturity; and under which communica-. tion plaintiffs…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Abell v. MunsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Cone v. KeilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  3. Brown v. EverhardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Witte v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ellis v. KlaffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  2. Moore v. BorgfeldtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Murphy v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Weldon v. GreerArizona Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Fogg v. McAdamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API