Legal Opinion

Fogg v. McAdam

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 25, 1914No. Civ No. 1504PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

Action to recover a broker’s commission for negotiating an exchange of real estate.

The sole question involved is the ruling of the court in sustaining a general demurrer to the complaint. Upon the making of the order and plaintiff’s declining to amend, judgment was entered for defendant, from which plaintiff prosecutes this appeal.

The complaint alleges that on May 11, 1911, defendant in writing authorized Merrill & Fogg, plaintiff’s assignors, to negotiate an exchange of certain real estate then owned by him for certain ranch property, consisting of four hundred and eighty acres, owned by one…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. PostCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Boyd v. Big Three Ranch Co.California Court of Appeal · 1913
  3. Connor v. RigginsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Augustine v. TruccoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. Murphy v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Weldon v. GreerArizona Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API