Legal Opinion

Robinson v. Maine Central Railroad

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 7, 1993PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUDMAN, Justice.

Maine Central Railroad Company (Maine Central) appeals from a summary judgment entered in the Superior Court (Penob-scot County, Chandler, J.) in favor of Lloyd D. and Carlene Robinson declaring that they were entitled to an implied easement across a portion of Maine Central’s tracks. On appeal, Maine Central contends that the Superior Court erred because there exists disputed issues of fact which should have precluded the issuance of a summary judgment. Maine Central further asserts that it is entitled to a summary judgment in its favor because the Robin-sons have not alleged…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. FO Bailey Co., Inc. v. Ledgewood, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
  2. H.E.P. Development Group, Inc. v. NelsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
  3. LeMay v. AndersonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  4. Frederick v. Consolidated Waste Services, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
  5. Watson v. FrenchSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jim Mitchell and Jed Davis, PA v. JacksonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
  2. Sprague Corp. v. SpragueDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1994
  3. Northland Realty, LLC v. CrawfordSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
  4. Connolly v. Maine Central RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
  5. Connolly v. Maine Central RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API