Robinson v. Maine Central Railroad
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
RUDMAN, Justice.
Maine Central Railroad Company (Maine Central) appeals from a summary judgment entered in the Superior Court (Penob-scot County, Chandler, J.) in favor of Lloyd D. and Carlene Robinson declaring that they were entitled to an implied easement across a portion of Maine Central’s tracks. On appeal, Maine Central contends that the Superior Court erred because there exists disputed issues of fact which should have precluded the issuance of a summary judgment. Maine Central further asserts that it is entitled to a summary judgment in its favor because the Robin-sons have not alleged…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- FO Bailey Co., Inc. v. Ledgewood, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
- H.E.P. Development Group, Inc. v. NelsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
- LeMay v. AndersonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- Frederick v. Consolidated Waste Services, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
- Watson v. FrenchSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jim Mitchell and Jed Davis, PA v. JacksonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
- Sprague Corp. v. SpragueDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1994
- Northland Realty, LLC v. CrawfordSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
- Connolly v. Maine Central RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
- Connolly v. Maine Central RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.