Connolly v. Maine Central Railroad
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.
[¶ 1] In this appeal, we consider whether use of an implied quasi-easement, historically used as a farm crossing, may be expanded to permit residential access and the installation of utility lines. This issue arises from a judgment of the Superior Court (Penobscot County, Studstmp, J.) that found that an implied quasi-easement exists over the land of Maine Central Railroad Company, but concluded that its use is limited to its historical use as a farm crossing. Frank Connolly and Kathryn McCatherin, who wish to use the easement for residential purposes, appeal from the judgment, arguing that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Flaherty v. MutherSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
- LeMay v. AndersonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- McGeechan v. SherwoodSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- Amodeo v. FrancisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- Bowers v. AndrewsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Brodhurst v. FrazierSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2012
- Edward E. Favart v. Steven M. Ouellette & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2020