LeMay v. Anderson
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
ARCHIBALD, Justice.
Pursuant to the Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act, 14 M.R.S.A. §§ 5951-5963, 1 the plaintiffs (husband and wife) sought in Superior Court a declaration of their right to utilize a road over property of the defendants (husband and wife) as the only means of access to their property on Unity Pond (also known as Lake Winnecook). They also sought injunctive relief. Following a non-jury trial the single justice found that an easement was created by implication in 1961. On the basis of that servitude the justice entered a “Declaratory Judgment that plaintiffs have a right to use…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Willets v. LanghaarMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Burns v. GallagherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1884
- Littlefield v. HubbardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1925
- Whittenton Manufacturing Co. v. StaplesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
- Reed v. AC McLoon & CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Stickney v. City of SacoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
- Morrell v. RiceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
- McGeechan v. SherwoodSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- Jost v. RestaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988
- Anchors v. ManterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.