State v. Sanders
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PAUL M. SPINDEN, Judge.
The state charged Victor Sanders with possessing a controlled substance. Sanders responded to the state’s charges by filing a motion to suppress the evidence that officers obtained while searching him and his vehicle. The circuit court sustained Sanders’ motion to suppress, and *350the state filed this interlocutory appeal. Because the circuit court refused to resolve the factual issues before it and erroneously applied the wrong burden of proof, we reverse and remand to the circuit court for further proceedings.
At the suppression hearing, the state presented evidence that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- State v. MilliornSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
- State v. WoolfolkMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- State v. MorrMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- Colombo v. BufordMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brian Mann, Movant/Appellant v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. StoebeMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. NebbittMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. ParkmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017