State v. Parkman
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtDon E. Burrell, J.
The State brings this timely interlocutory appeal1 to seek a reversal of the trial court’s order granting Angie Lynn Parkman’s (“Defendant”) motion to suppress the seizure and search of her “person, home, purse, and cell phones” (“the suppression motion”) after an evidentiary hearing.2 The police searched Defendant’s residence based on information suggesting that she was involved in illegal drug activity. Because the trial court did not decide whether Defendant had consented to the search, we reverse its ruling and remand the matter for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Applicab…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. KnightsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Samson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- State v. MilliornSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
- State v. SundSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State of Missouri v. Deion D'Wayne CrumMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021
- State of Missouri v. Thomas Eugene AntleMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021