Bergin v. Hinckley
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. A. A. Sanderson, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
The appellant, Florence Blythe Hinckley, then Florence Blythe, on the 19th of January, 1892, executed to the plaintiff two instruments in writing by which she promised to pay to him the moneys therein named within one year after the determination of her right and title to the estate of Thomas H. Blythe, deceased, in the legal proceedings then pending for the determination of the same in the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco. This action was brought by the plaintiff upon these obligations April 16, 1896, the complaint alleging that there had been a final determination of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Shain v. People's Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
- Blythe v. AyresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hart v. WaltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
- Vance v. Supreme Lodge of the Fraternal BrotherhoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- Highland Park Investment Co. v. ListCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Wood v. MesmerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918