Hart v. Walton
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Mendocino County, and from an order denying a new trial. J. Q. White, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The action was brought to reform a deed. Plaintiff alleges that' on the second day of November, 1893, defendant was the owner of certain lands in Mendocino county, consisting of two hundred acres, which are described in paragraph 1 of the complaint; that on said date the defendant agreed to sell, and did sell, said real property to one Mrs. Louise D. Milks; “that on the said 2nd day of November, 1893, the said defendant made, executed and delivered his deed of conveyance intending to convey and describe the lands hereinbefore in paragraph 1 of this complaint set forth and described and no…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Murphy v. CrowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Goodnow v. ParkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Breen v. DonnellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- The Union Ice Co. v. DoyleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Bergin v. HinckleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
3Cited by15 opinions
- Leeper v. BeltramiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Carman v. AthearnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Weber v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Mills v. SchulbaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Danielson v. NealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.