Legal Opinion
Highland Park Investment Co. v. List
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 19, 1919No. Civ. No. 3035PublishedCited by 5 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. -
1Opinion of the CourtWaste, P. J.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, after the second trial, the ease having once before been before the appellate court. (Highland Park Inv. Co. v. List, 27 Cal. App. 761, [151 Pac. 162].)
The action was brought to recover a sum of money alleged to have been secured by appellant R. D. List as a secret profit upon a sale of certain lots of land to plaintiff corporation. The facts are fully and succinctly stated in the opinion of the court on the former appeal, and do not need to be repeated.
[1] “ The directors of a corporation hold a fiduciary relation to the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wickersham v. CrittendenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Western States Life Ins. Co. v. LockwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Pacific Vinegar & Pickle Works v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Ex-Mission Land & Water Co. v. FlashCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Prouty v. DevinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bainbridge v. StonerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Dettamanti v. Lompoc Union School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Oldenburg v. BrodyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Bainbridge v. StonerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Farmer v. StandevenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937