Legal Opinion
King v. Leavy
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 22, 1932No. Docket No. 8461PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.
This is an appeal from the judgment of the trial court granting to the petitioner a writ of mandate. The petitioner is and for some years has been a boilermaker employed in the fire department of San Francisco. On the 15th of January, 1932, he applied for his pay, $96.19, and believing that the demand was higher than authorized by law the defendant, as controller, refused to audit the demand. Thereupon this proceeding was commenced. The San Francisco Bureau of Governmental Research intervened.
There is no claim that prior to January 8, 1932, the date the new charter took effect, the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- San Pedro, Los Angeles & Salt Lake Railroad v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Spinney v. GriffithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Older v. Superior Court of the State in and for KernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Miller v. CurryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- The Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. JurgensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn. v. City of RosevilleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Banks v. Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- State v. SprayberryNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010