The Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. Jurgens
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of defendant and from an order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.
The action was to foreclose the lien of a street assessment for work on San Pablo Avenue in the city of Oakland. The findings of the court were in substantial compliance with the defendant’s answer, and, in brief, were to the effect that the contract between the superintendent of streets and the plaintiff was made before the expiration of ten days after the posting and publication of the notice of award of contract; that the contract as recorded was different from the one…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Chase v. TroutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- City of Atchison v. KingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
- State ex rel. Harrison v. FrazierSupreme Court of Missouri · 1889
- Muir's Adm'rs v. City of BardstownCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1905
- Santa Rosa City R. Co. v. Central St. Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Washington National Insurance v. Board of Review of New Jersey Unemployment Compensation CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
- Weinberger v. Board of Public InstructionSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
- Brougher v. Board of Public WorksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Martin v. City of CorningCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Raisch v. Regents of Univ. of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.