Legal Opinion

Older v. Superior Court of the State in and for Kern

California Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1910No. S.F. No. 5384PublishedCited by 16 opinions

APPLICATION for Writ of Mandate to the Superior Court of Kern County. C. W. Norton, Judge presiding. = The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Hiram Johnson, Sullivan & Sullivan, and Theo. J. Roche, for Petitioner. J. W. P. Laird, Bowen Irvin, and John E. Bennett, for Bespondents.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

The petitioner, Older, asked the district court of .appeal of the third appellate district to issue a writ of mandate compelling respondents to entertain and determine the right of said petitioner to a change of venue of an action for criminal libel pending in Kern County. The motion for change of venue was based upon grounds other than that mentioned in section 1033 of the Penal Code. After deciding preliminarily that, in spite of the fact that Kern County is in the second appellate district, the district court of appeal of the third district had jurisdiction to issue the writ, that court…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Springfield v. EdwardsIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Washingtonian Home v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  3. People v. StephensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Powers v. City of RichmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Cantrell v. MorrisIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Leger v. Stockton Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  4. Higer v. HansenIdaho Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Story v. RichardsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API