Legal Opinion

Yost v. DETROIT BD. OF EDUC.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 2001No. 119048, COA No. 228742PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

635 N.W.2d 309 (2001)

Grace YOST, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

DETROIT BOARD OF EDUCATION and Second Injury Fund and Hotel Pontchartrain Ltd and Insurance Company of Pennsylvania and Accident Fund Company, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 119048, COA No. 228742.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

November 16, 2001.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the February 9, 2001 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

2Concurrence · TaylorTaylor, J.

I join in the Court's order to deny leave. I respectfully disagree…

Also in this document: Dissent; Concurrence · Cavanagh.

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mudel v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Holden v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Goff v. Bil-Mar Foods, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Blanzy v. Brigadier General Contractors, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2000

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Agnes N Cramer v. Transitional Health Services of WayneMichigan Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Agnes N Cramer v. Transitional Health Services of WayneMichigan Supreme Court · 2023
  3. Ruben Castro v. James Alan Goulet MdMichigan Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Ruben Castro v. James Alan Goulet MdMichigan Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API