Legal Opinion

United States v. Harrison

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided June 9, 1978No. ACM S24579PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

ARROWOOD, Judge:

The Specification of Charge I alleges that the accused attempted to violate Air Force Regulation 30-2, dated 8 November 1976, by wrongfully selling cocaine. This regulation only prohibits the sale of nonnarcotic drugs that are habit-forming or have a potential for abuse because of their stimulant, depressant, or hallucinogenic effect. This category includes but is not limited to: amphetamines,- barbiturates, LSD (lysergic acid diethylamide), mescaline, STP (4 methyl-2 demethoxy-amphetamine), and psilocybin. The sale of cocaine, defined by this regulation as a narcotic…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. CourtneyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  2. United States v. MooreU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1977
  3. United States v. PopeU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1977
  4. United States v. McCueU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1977
  5. United States v. HoesingU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. WalkerU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1979
  2. United States v. D'AielloU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1979
  3. United States v. ConnellU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1980
  4. United States v. JonesU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1981
  5. United States v. LayU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API