United States v. Walker
U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review
1Per curiam
Appellant has assigned two errors; however, only one need be addressed inasmuch as it raises the question whether the case is properly before this Court for review.
*977Appellant has challenged the propriety of the action by the general officer who approved the sentence. In his action that officer stated, “I am taking both the initial action and the supervisory authority’s action due to the overseas deployment of the convening authority with Battalion Landing Team, 3d Battalion, 3d Marine Regiment.” There is no indication in the record that the convening authority either requested such action or…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. VaraUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
- United States v. WiseUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
- United States v. HarrisonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1978
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. AlexanderU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1983
- United States v. JamesU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1982
- United States v. JonesU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1981