Legal Opinion

United States v. Pope

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided July 19, 1977No. ACM 22192PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

EARLY, Senior Judge:

Tried by general court-martial, the accused was convicted, despite his pleas, of possessing lysergic acid diethylamide and heroin, in violation of Article 92, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 892. The approved sentence extends to a bad conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for six months, forfeiture of $100.00 per month for six months and reduction to the grade of E — 1.

Appellate defense counsel assign one error:

PROSECUTION EXHIBITS 1, 2, 4 AND 5 WERE THE PRODUCTS OF AN UNLAWFUL SEARCH OF THE ACCUSED.

We agree.

On the day in question, Special…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Henry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. United States v. Di ReSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Rhinelda M. Bell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. ShepherdU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1987
  2. United States v. ThomasU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1981
  3. United States v. HarrisonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1978
  4. United States v. BrayU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1981
  5. United States v. PopeU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API