Legal Opinion

United States v. Hoesing

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided August 26, 1977No. ACM 22243PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

ABRAMS, Chief Judge:

Tried by a general court-martial without members, the accused was convicted, consistent with his pleas, of one specification of violating a lawful general regulation, in violation of Article 92, Uniform Code of Military Justice, and three specifications charging either transfer or use of hashish, in violation of Article 134, Code, supra, 10 U.S.C. §§ 892, 934. The approved sentence provides for a bad conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for twelve months, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and reduction to airman basic.

Three claims of error are asserted…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. CourtneyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  2. United States v. JacksonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  3. United States v. WilliamsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. HoesingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
  2. United States v. DillardU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1977
  3. United States v. HarrisonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1978
  4. United States v. WhiteU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1977
  5. United States v. ZinningerU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API